(2 of 2)
On Ayatullah Ruhollah Khomeini: The chances for peace appear slim because Khomeini is a politician, not a man of principle. As time goes by, he is beginning to reveal his superficiality. The more he talks, the more he makes himself a laughingstock. I wish the whole world would read his statements to form an impression of this shallow devil. The actions he has carried out do not indicate that he is a rational person.
On Moslem Sectarian Strife: A great deal of misinformation has been spread in the Western press concerning religious differences in Iraq. It is true that religious and sectarian differences could create problems in some countries, but not in Iraq. I am not saying we do not have any problems at all. Any leader would prefer his people to think from one point of view, to be of one religion, one sect, in one city. The Iraqi people think from various angles but agree on one central point. We have Sunnis and Shi'ites here, that is a fact. But all of them are Iraqis, and all of them love their revolution. They are fighting their enemy with the same spirit.
On the U.S.S.R.: The Soviet Union says frankly that it is interested in preserving Iraq and does not want to see our country in a bad condition. At the same time, the Soviets say that what took place in Iran, after the fall of the Shah, has the meaning of a great change in international strategy. Iran lies on the frontier of the Soviet Union. We are not accusing or cursing the Soviet Union. Iran is. We are not following the Soviet Line. Iran is. The Soviets have targets and aims in the region, among them Iran.
On the Israeli Invasion of Lebanon: I believe the bitterness caused by the invasion cannot yet be evaluated, but it will have consequences contrary to those that the planners of this dirty operation had imagined. We reaffirm the saying: we are always with any Arab, wherever he may be, against any foreigner if he is an aggressor against Arabs.
On U.S. Policy in the Middle East: I believe America has three fundamental interests in the region—commercial trade, improved economic relations and keeping countries from being attracted by the alternative influence [the Soviet Union]. These three considerations can be fulfilled. Take technology and expertise. Do they exist in the Soviet Union or in America? I will answer you. The technology we require exists in the U.S., or in Europe and Japan. If there were a relationship between the Arabs and the West based on mutual respect, you would see the size of trade grow between us.
On Israel: Israel considers itself in a state of war with Iraq. We have not carried out a military action against Israel since the 1973 war. Yet when we became involved in the war with Iran, Israel came and stabbed us in the back. How can we interpret the Israeli strike against Iraq's nuclear reactor last summer except as an act of war? You should not let the Israelis be so arrogant. If President Reagan were here, I would tell him very precisely not to use the Israeli club. You must not exaggerate the strength of Israel. You must advise Israel to look at its long-term future and not use all its strength to seize Arab lands. Israel is like Khomeini, although in a different way, with a different mentality.