THE AGE OF ROOSEVELT, ITHE CRISIS OF THE OLD ORDER, 1919-1933 (557 pp.)Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr.Houghton Mifflin ($6).
In 1919 a handsome young New York aristocrat with a politically useful name spotlighted the man he wanted to see as the next President of the U.S. Said Franklin Delano Roosevelt of Herbert Hoover: "He is certainly a wonder and I wish we could make him President . . . There could not be a better one." By 1932, no two men lived in colder enmity. In F.D.R.'s view. Hoover had become a dragon who was devouring the common man. To Hoover, Roosevelt was at worst an economic madman, at best a mere "featherduster" (the nickname had been devised by kindly friends who considered F.D.R. a mental lightweight, a view then shared by Mr. Justice Holmes and Pundit Walter Lippmann. among others). In the first of four volumes on The Age of Roosevelt, the author of The Age of Jackson now tells how the featherduster became a shining knight who slew the dragon.
The Crisis of the Old Order, a Book-of-the-Month-Club selection for March, shows Harvard Historian Arthur Schlesinger jr. handling history with the touch of a man assembling ammunition for a political campaign. Schlesinger hardly bothers to disguise his bias or his political philosophy, which (at least on the evidence of this book) boils down to the slogan: let Government do it. And he clings to the curiously innocent notion that Government can run the economic show without eventually controlling the entrances and exits of personal and political freedom.
Black & White. Schlesinger lays down a line that many historians will find hard to toe: business during the early years of the 20th century pretty much ran the U.S. Under Theodore Roosevelt and Wilson, the common man had found champions whose influence petered out after World War I. Prosperity left the liberals crying in the wilderness, and businessmen plundered and ruined the economic system. The big boys were so greedy that they not only killed the goose that laid the golden egg but ate it without offering the ordinary man so much as a bone. The country was on the verge of revolution when along came F.D.R. He didn't know much about economics, but he was nice to liberals such as Rexford Tugwell, who proclaimed that "the future is becoming visible in Russia," and A. A. Berle, who saw "no great difference between having all industry run by a committee of Commissars and by a small group of Directors." Above all, F.D.R. denounced business and was committed to large doses of statism. At book's end, in 1933, Roosevelt, "armored in some inner faith . . . serenely awaited the morrow."
All this is not so much written as pasted together. Economic theories, political maneuvers, even the Roosevelt biographyall are told through endless quotations barely held together by some bright phrases. Complex changes are told with the black and white naivete of a medieval morality play even when Schlesinger is not directly dealing with his hero or chief villain: e.g., after World War I, "with peace, selfishness returned"as simple as that.
