Flying from Columbia, S.C., to Wilmington, Del., last Friday, John Kerry sat down with TIME senior correspondent Douglas Waller and writer-reporter Eric Roston.
TIME: Are you too liberal to be elected President?
Kerry: That's a phony label that people try [to apply], but it
doesn't work. Do you know the first thing I did when I got to
Congress in 1985? I joined with Fritz Hollings as one of the original
authors and sponsors of the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings deficit-reduction
bill. It was heresy at home, but it proved to be the right policy.
I've voted for welfare reform, one of the major defining issues of
the decade, because I felt we needed to change the culture. We needed
to make work valuable. And I've been for faith-based charitable
efforts before it was popular. I just don't think the label fits.
TIME: What kind of Democrat are you?
Kerry: A thinking Democrat. You can call me an old-fashioned New Deal
Democrat on X or Y. I'm not going to break faith on Social Security.
I'm not going to abandon people who are struggling to earn a decent
wage. But call me a New Democrat when it comes to creating jobs and
being entrepreneurial and understanding the bottom line of business.
TIME: Where do you see yourself as vulnerable to attacks from
Republicans?
Kerry: They'll probe and try to figure that one out. I'm not going to
help them.
TIME: You once opposed mandatory sentences for people convicted of
drug crimes.
Kerry: Yeah, but I voted for them later on. There may have been an
individual instance where I thought they were too long or didn't make
sense. But I've voted for mandatory minimums in certain instances.
TIME: Explain why you voted against the Iraq-war resolution in 1991
but voted for the Iraq-war resolution in 2002.
Kerry: It's very simple. I was for kicking Saddam Hussein out of
Kuwait. I was for using force if we needed to. I simply felt, based
on Colin Powell's own statements and others', that we needed a little
more time to get the support of the nation in the event that things
didn't go well. When you go to war, you want the support of your
nation. But there was never a doubt about kicking him outnever a
doubt about using force, never a doubt about what was at stake. In
the case of this instance [2002], I thought it was important to hold
Saddam Hussein accountable. I said so in 1998, because he signed an
agreement to disarm. And I thought it was critical for us and the
world to hold him accountable to it. But there was a right way to do
it, and there was a wrong way to do it. George Bush chose the wrong
way and broke his promises to us about how he would go about it. It
is particularly important for me that leaders keep faith with the
American people about how they send young men to die. And I believe
it ought to be done with a maximum amount of support and the maximum
amount of potential for success.
TIME: Howard Dean says he has a leg up on you because he has run a
large organization as a Governor.
Kerry: I've run a lot of different things, and I've run them well.
And the skill, the test, is leadership. If you ask my men in the
military and those who worked with me, there was no one who ever
doubted. I've had major ships under my command in a tactical
situation. I was able to call in air strikes, rockets, ships, troops,
helicopters. I've exercised major responsibility, life and death.
I've exercised responsibility as officer of the deck of a ship
carrying nuclear weapons. I've exercised responsibility as a
Lieutenant Governor, when the Governor was out of state and I've been
the acting Governor. Of a bigger state. The question is, How did you
do when you did those things? I find the only difference is of size.
You're either a good executive or you're not.
TIME: You've been described by colleagues as aloof, not a backslapper
who hangs out in the cloakroom telling jokes. Have you tried to keep
your distance from the Senate club?
Kerry: No, I think it's more a question of being focused on the work.
And clearly for many years being preoccupied with getting home to be
with my kids. I mean, for 17 years I never spent a weekend in
Washington, D.C. When Thursday night came, I was like a Congressman.
I was gone.
TIME: On the campaign trail you've said some pretty harsh things
about George Bush's policies. What do you think about Bush
personally?
Kerry: Well, what do you think is the harshest thing I've said? I
mean, what's harsh about a reckless, arrogant, ideological foreign
policy? That adequately describes it. It's reckless not to talk to
North Korea. It's reckless to leave aids floundering for several
years. It's reckless not to contain nuclear material in Russia.
That's a very direct word for it. I like him very much personally.
He's a very engaging, very personable, very good guy. People enjoy
his company. He's an enjoyable person. I just disagree with him in
terms of his vision and his direction. It's just a disagreement on
what matters, what's important.