TKAfter the Florida legislature thrust
itself last week into the debate over whether Terri Schiavo should be
allowed to die,
by authorizing
Governor Jeb Bush to order the reinsertion of her feeding tube, the
acrimonious battle entered a new and possibly protracted round in the
courts. But in the court of public opinion, at least, the
finger-pointing over what led to Terri's 1990 collapse at age 26
could get nastier. Her parents, Bob and Mary Schindler (who want her
kept alive), have suggested that her husband Michael Schiavo (who
insists she would not have
wanted to live in her vegetative state) physically abused her. He
vehemently denies the charge. But one possible cause of her collapse
could soon become an issue. In a 1992 medical-
malpractice suit brought by Michael, bulimia was raised as a possibly
significant factor in the cardiac arrest that caused her brain
damage. (She was considered seriously underweight at the time.)
Terri's alleged eating disorder could be used by both sidesand most
probably will be. The Schindlers believe verbally abusive behavior by
Michael led to the bulimia. Michael denies that, and his supporters
insist the eating disorder dates back to Terri's weight problems as a
child.
Meanwhile, expect the new court battle to be drawn out. Michael is
challenging the
constitutionality of actions by Bush and the legislature
countermanding a court ruling just days earlier that Terri's feeding
tube should be removed. Legal scholars predict the reinsertion order
will
be overturned as an unconstitutional violation of the separation of
powers. Michael's lawyers say they hope to have the state supreme
court do just that in a few weeks. Their opponents would probably
appeal it first to Florida's district court of appeals, say sources
familiar with the case. The reason: Bush and the Christian right feel
a protracted legal battle works in their favor by giving them more
time to galvanize public opinion behind them.
![]()