Quotes of the Day

columbia
Sunday, Mar. 16, 2003

Open quoteDeath comes quickly in space, unless it comes very slowly. The crew of the shuttle Challenger is thought — or hoped — to have suffered little. Crew members of Apollo 13, had they not made it home, would have needed days to breathe up all their air and suffocate. Ever since the crack-up of the shuttle Columbia last month, NASA has wanted to know how the astronauts on that doomed ship met their end — believing that the precise sequence of events on the crew decks would reveal a lot about the precise sequence of breakdowns throughout the ship.

Slowly, investigators are piecing together the answers. Space-agency technicians have been scrutinizing the final, fragmentary transmissions that came from the disintegrating Columbia, particularly a telltale, 2-sec. scrap of data deciphered for the first time only last week. Analysts are also paying closer attention to the 13-min. videotape, recovered partly intact from the wreckage, that the crew made during re-entry. Perhaps most important, some former astronauts have been willing to speculate — cautiously — on what might have been taking place inside Columbia in the critical minutes after the video went black and before the ship was destroyed. The sketchy picture that all this paints is of a professional team of astronauts doing everything they could to fly their vehicle, even as events overtook them.


LATEST COVER STORY
Mind & Body Happiness
Jan. 17, 2004
 

SPECIAL REPORTS
 Coolest Video Games 2004
 Coolest Inventions
 Wireless Society
 Cool Tech 2004


PHOTOS AND GRAPHICS
 At The Epicenter
 Paths to Pleasure
 Quotes of the Week
 This Week's Gadget
 Cartoons of the Week


MORE STORIES
Advisor: Rove Warrior
The Bushes: Family Dynasty
Klein: Benneton Ad Presidency


CNN.com: Latest News

The videotape, which runs from 8:35 to 8:48 a.m. E.T.--ending about 11 min. before the ship was destroyed — shows the astronauts just where they ought to have been that late in the mission, with commander Rick Husband, pilot William McCool and crew members Laurel Clark and Kalpana Chawla strapped into their seats on the main flight deck. Crewmates Ilan Ramon, David Brown and Michael Anderson were out of view, similarly belted into place on the middeck below. When the tape begins, Chawla and Clark are finishing their suiting up, while Husband and McCool are busy flying the ship.

"Oh, shoot!" Husband says, as he accidentally hits a control that briefly switches the spacecraft from autopilot to manual. "We bumped the stick earlier."

"Not a problem, Rick," Mission Control answers. "Yeah, but ..." Husband grumbles, sounding displeased that the harmless mistake happened at all.

Outside the windows, glowing plasma is flickering like lightning. "Is that [maneuvering] jets firing in the back?" Chawla asks. McCool replies, "That might be some plasma. The jets are not firing now."

The crew members spend the next few minutes enjoying the light show while tending to their suits and instruments and feeling for the return of the first ghost of gravity. When the ship is pulling only one-hundredth of a G, McCool is heard commenting that when he drops a card, it falls, a sure sign that Columbia is crossing the line from extraterrestrial to terrestrial.

Shortly afterward, the video record ends, but things probably remained routine until 3 min. later--8 min. before the accident — when NASA got its first indication of what it dryly calls off-nominal aero increments. Translation: the shuttle was growing unstable because of the loss of insulating tiles, and the computer-controlled flaps were attempting to compensate. Inside the ship this would not have caused concern.

"They probably noticed that the aero surfaces were being trimmed," says former astronaut Norman Thagard, a veteran of five shuttle flights and a tour of duty aboard the Russian space station Mir. "They might have commented that the vehicle was taking some sort of action, but it was still within the ability of the system to stay flying."

Just a few seconds later, however, when Columbia was 300 miles west of California, temperature sensors in the brake lines began to flutter — an anomaly, but a minor one. One minute 27 sec. after that, the first confirmed piece of debris broke away from the shuttle. While this was apparent to observers on the ground, it was not visible to the crew inside the disintegrating ship. "The wing is well behind you," says Thagard.

Less than 2 min. before the end, the problems began to cascade: the instrument panel blinking with a tire-pressure alert, a thruster-leak signal, a roll warning and more. The crew — at least the four astronauts on the flight deck — would have known something was up. "They are seeing multiple failures on top of one another," says former astronaut Tom Henricks, who piloted two shuttle missions and commanded two others. "But they are still thinking they can handle things like they do in the simulator."

Henricks and Thagard agree that whatever the commander and the pilot were doing to right the ship, the rest of the crew probably stayed quiet and let them do it. The astronauts on the flight deck were wired for sound, so anything they said was picked up by their microphones. The three on the middeck had mikes too, but if they wanted to be heard, they had to punch into the ship's intercom. All of them would have kept the chatter to a minimum. "If you're not flying the ship, you keep your mouth shut," says Thagard.

Less than a minute before the breakup, the last voice exchange took place between the ground and the ship. "There were probably a few folks in Mission Control who had a strong suspicion something catastrophic would happen," Henricks says. Houston radioed up a final, much less apocalyptic message about tire pressure, and Husband responded, "Roger, uh ..."

For 5 sec. after that, only computer data streamed down, and then all contact was lost. Finally, 25 sec. later, the ship crackled back online for just 2 sec., but the data packed into that brief burst told a chilling tale. According to the readings, the ship was in a flat, counterclockwise spin, moving at 20° per second, meaning it would complete a full rotation in 18 sec. Actually, Columbia was probably twirling faster than that, but 20° per second is as much as its systems could record, given that that's more than the ship could take. The data also suggest that Husband switched the spacecraft from autopilot to manual, evidently fighting to stabilize his spacecraft. There was no "Oh, shoot" this time.

"Motion like that is almost instantaneous," says Thagard. "You'd try to take manual control, but there may have been no time to do more than mutter an expletive. Once it's got that far, you've probably lost it."

Henricks, however, is not so sure things happened that quickly. "For 15 or 20 seconds Husband would probably have been struggling to regain control of the orbiter," he says. "It would have been hair-raising because he knew survival wasn't likely."

It's Thagard's quicker scenario that most people hope — and increasingly believe — is the right one. The frantic, final howl from Columbia's computers ended 4.826 sec. after 9 a.m. E.T., and NASA does place the disintegration of the vehicle within the next 20 sec. The official timeline, however, is in its 14th revision, and it will probably change again, perhaps eliminating the 20-sec. death spiral. If the end indeed came so fast, it would be one small mercy in a day otherwise devoid of it.Close quote

  • Jeffrey Kluger
Photo: NASA | Source: Did Columbia's crew see trouble coming, or was the end mercifully fast? Answers are starting to emerge