“Eight miles over the speed limit,” declared the police officer, but Paul VanderMaat was incredulous. No matter what the radar said, he had been driving no faster than 25 m.p.h. in Los Alamos, N. Mex. Home he went to consult some books, and a few weeks later he ex plained to Judge Raymond E. Hunter that he had been nabbed about ten minutes before a thunderstorm, just when the oncoming electricity creates ionized particles in the air that can throw radar out of kilter. Case dismissed.
Hunter is only a part-time judge and, like VanderMaat, a theoretical physicist at the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. Explained the judge: “Only in Los Alamos could a defendant use a principle of advanced physics in his defense and have a judge understand.”
Maybe so, but VanderMaat notes that under the same weather conditions, the same radar foul-up could happen anywhere—and that it could be grounds for an accused speeder’s defense.
More Must-Reads from TIME
- Cybersecurity Experts Are Sounding the Alarm on DOGE
- Meet the 2025 Women of the Year
- The Harsh Truth About Disability Inclusion
- Why Do More Young Adults Have Cancer?
- Colman Domingo Leads With Radical Love
- How to Get Better at Doing Things Alone
- Michelle Zauner Stares Down the Darkness
Contact us at letters@time.com