Ever since they dropped words like “Mr.” from their headlines, U.S. news papers have made their own language as they went along. Their independence has been limited only by type, column widths, and their own often curious taste. Even Franklin Roosevelt, an old phrase coiner, got nowhere with his “War for Survival.” The press* made it World War II, which stuck.
Last week the United Nations’ press section made a modest request: would the papers please take the O out of UNO, which was never christened an “Organization?” Manhattan dailies unanimously agreed to make a short headline word even shorter, although the sensitive Sun protested that UN is “merely a negative grunt . . . not half so pleasing to ear or tongue.” Even the UNhospitable Daily News, which wants the outfit to get “com pletely out of the United States” (to northwest Mexico), went along. The press seemed willing to give U.N., at least on little things, every break.
* In this case, led by TIME.
More Must-Reads from TIME
- Cybersecurity Experts Are Sounding the Alarm on DOGE
- Meet the 2025 Women of the Year
- The Harsh Truth About Disability Inclusion
- Why Do More Young Adults Have Cancer?
- Colman Domingo Leads With Radical Love
- How to Get Better at Doing Things Alone
- Michelle Zauner Stares Down the Darkness
Contact us at letters@time.com