Muslims and Mosques
The term Islamophobia in “Islam in America” [Aug. 30] is problematic. It’s an effective accusation utilized to silence critics of Islam. A phobia is an irrational fear. One can be certain that there are many uninformed individuals who are simply prejudiced against any and all Muslims. But there are serious, legitimate and completely rational reasons to fear and criticize this religion.
Anthony Morris, TORONTO
TIME’s editorial bias is revealed in the use of the term Islamophobia. A phobia is a mental illness, an irrational fear of something. In the aftermath of 9/11 and other Islamic terrorist acts in the U.S. and around the world, it is more irrational to not be very afraid.
Eugene Cherny, DES MOINES, IOWA
At a time when politicians and the like spew venomous rhetoric at one another, Bobby Ghosh’s cover story is very enlightening. It is amazing that people would trust their lives to a Muslim physician but not let him have a place to pray.
Saroja Venkatraman, GAITHERSBURG, MD.
Ghosh incorrectly tries to link fringe bigotry toward peaceful American Muslims to the commonsense opposition shared by the majority of Americans to building a mosque near Ground Zero. By labeling those opposed to the plan prejudiced, he thinks he can effectively discredit and distract from a prudent argument. We are not racist; we simply want to keep the sanctity of Ground Zero intact.
Eugene Ryan, ESTERO, FLA.
Is America Islamophobic? From the recent comments of presidential hopefuls Newt Gingrich, Sarah Palin and Tim Pawlenty, Muslims must think so.
Mark Weber, MINNEAPOLIS
The Skinny on Organic
Kudos to Jeffrey Kluger for arguing in “What’s So Great About Organic Food?” [Aug. 30] that we should consider the treatment of animals–not just the health benefits to ourselves–in deciding whether to buy organic animal products. The best solution, though, is to eat as few animal products as possible, organic or not. It’s more humane, it’s healthier, and it increases the feeding power of the planet.
Alison Hansen-Decelles, CUMBERLAND, R.I.
It would have been refreshing if TIME had allotted as much print space to modern agricultural scientists as it did to celebrity chefs. Given the chance, agriculture can show that it produces safe, healthy, nutritious and affordable food products in ways that are also good for the environment.
Edward Janke, CHAPMAN, KANS.
Double Vision
What an amazing and clever graphic in Nancy Gibbs’ “Sacred Spaces” Essay [Aug. 30]. Halfway through reading, I noticed there was not just a minaret in the center but also the Twin Towers. The image illustrates how with a second look, things may not be what they first seem.
Ana Parke, SEATTLE
A Difficult Diagnosis
The article “Maybe Lou Gehrig Didn’t Die of Lou Gehrig’s Disease” [Aug. 17] has been disconcerting to patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) because of the implication that they may have been misdiagnosed. In fact, ALS is diagnosed by identifying well-defined clinical criteria, and Gehrig definitively had ALS. It is a complete disservice to suggest otherwise. There are multiple causes of ALS, and studies on the role of trauma are certainly warranted. Equally warranted is sensitivity to the plight of patients and families currently confronting the ravages of ALS.
Dr. Valerie A. Cwik, Research and Medical Director, Muscular Dystrophy Association, TUCSON, ARIZ.
Please recycle this magazine and remove inserts or samples before recycling
More Must-Reads from TIME
- Cybersecurity Experts Are Sounding the Alarm on DOGE
- Meet the 2025 Women of the Year
- The Harsh Truth About Disability Inclusion
- Why Do More Young Adults Have Cancer?
- Colman Domingo Leads With Radical Love
- How to Get Better at Doing Things Alone
- Michelle Zauner Stares Down the Darkness
Contact us at letters@time.com