In January, the Supreme Court upheld the right for corporations to spend money influencing political campaigns, ruling that these entities ought to have the same First Amendment rights as individuals to engage in "political speech." The historic and, in some quarters, infamous Citizens United vs. the Federal Election Commission decision fell to a tight 5-4 vote. Its implications are huge: superseding earlier understandings, the Court has now deemed corporate money, funneled by lobbyists and special interest groups into politics, as equivalent to any individual donation even though, by many people's reckonings, a corporation with its resources and focused agenda is hardly the same thing as an individual person. President Obama, for one, was scathing about the verdict, saying "this ruling strikes at our democracy itself." But such prominent First Amendment advocates as Floyd Abrams often associated with defending journalists' rights argued vociferously that the court did the right thing by preserving the guarantees of the amendment.