The Defense Goes On the Offensive

  • Share
  • Read Later
WASHINGTON: This was probably as close to Perry Mason as we're going to get. "Charles Ruff had the advantage because his stuff at least seemed new," says TIME White House correspondent Jay Branegan. "He hit hard with different timelines for an obstruction case, and he managed to attack the House managers' case while arguing that the basis for it -- the Starr report -- was so thorough that witnesses weren't needed." The big score: reminding senators that Vernon Jordan was on a plane to Amsterdam when Monica Lewinsky was ruled relevant to the Paula Jones case. As Ruff said, "So much for obstruction," although afterward Republicans were quick to point out that an ounce of obstruction, before the fact, is just as bad as a pound.

Special Report With his usual candor and understatement, Ruff also managed to show the House managers a thing or two about patriotism -- or at least how to play it for votes. "I don't have the experience of serving in the military," said the wheelchair-bound Ruff. Those who died in battle, though, "didn't fight for one side of this case or another." Branegan says Ruff did his job: "Raise enough doubts so that those who vote not to convict will have some points on which to hang their hat politically." And just like Raymond Burr in those afternoon reruns, he wrapped it all up in plenty of time for dinner. Coming at 9 p.m. (ET)/8 p.m. central: The defense's star witness takes the podium -- with no oath.