A St. Paul, Minn., judge ruled last week that a divorcee who thought she had paid off a $625 bill for electrical work by sleeping with the contractor still owed him $377, plus interest and court costs, because the sex was "performed for the enjoyment of both parties." Besides, Judge Ronald Hachey suggested unchivalrously, the woman's favors may not have been worth all that much. "Unfortunately," he said, "there was no testimony to help the court with respect to the going rate charged by those engaged in one of the oldest professions known to mankind." Hachey went on to note...
To continue reading:
or
Log-In
