The Supreme Court: In the Federal v. State Thicket

Felix Frankfurter was not merely phrasemaking in 1946 when he warned the Supreme Court to shun the "political thicket" of state legislative apportionment. The court plunged in anyway—with last year's historic one-man, one-vote rule—and ever since, the political thicket has echoed with muffled blows, groans, and cries for divine guidance. Now lower courts are fighting not only state legislatures but one another. In New York last week, two of them battled bench to bench in a grinding collision between federal and state power.

New York's federal courts have long recoiled from meddling with the state's...

Want the full story?

Subscribe Now

Subscribe
Subscribe

Get TIME the way you want it

  • One Week Digital Pass — $4.99
  • Monthly Pay-As-You-Go DIGITAL ACCESS$2.99
  • One Year ALL ACCESSJust $30!   Best Deal!
    Print Magazine + Digital Edition + Subscriber-only Content on TIME.com

Learn more about the benefits of being a TIME subscriber

If you are already a subscriber sign up — registration is free!