Are radio's scandalmongers committing libel when they broadcast defamatory remarks from a scriptor is it just slander?* Until last week this was a wide-open legal question. Then the New York Court of Appeals provided an answer by handing down a unanimous andto radiochilling decision.
The man most immediately affected was Walter Winchell (an old hand at libel suits), who had sought dismissal of a $50,000 action. George W. Hartmann, a onetime Columbia University professor, had accused Winchell of libeling him on a January 1944 broadcast.
Said concurring Justice Stanley H. Fuld: "When account is taken of the vast and far-flung audience reached by...