Letters

Sunday, July 25, 2004
    • Michael Moore's War

    Moore's movie may be a mix of fact and fiction, but anything that opens up discussion on the invasion of Iraq is good for America.
    JOHN MIRANDA
    Oro Valley, Ariz.


    LATEST COVER STORY
    Mind & Body Happiness
    Jan. 17, 2004
     

    SPECIAL REPORTS
     Coolest Video Games 2004
     Coolest Inventions
     Wireless Society
     Cool Tech 2004

    PHOTOS AND GRAPHICS
     At The Epicenter
     Paths to Pleasure
     Quotes of the Week
     This Week's Gadget
     Cartoons of the Week

    MORE STORIES
    Advisor: Rove Warrior
    The Bushes: Family Dynasty
    Klein: Benneton Ad Presidency

    CNN.com: Latest News

    Michael Moore's film Fahrenheit 9/11 is not just the politics of entertainment or the entertainment of politics [July 12]. For those who have been assimilating information and connecting the dots since George W. Bush took office, Moore simply lays it all out — the whole picture — which is something that our main media have been too gutless to do. Nothing Moore points out is a surprise. Everything he presents in this film should make an American citizen angry. Those who are shocked by Moore's documentary have not been paying attention to current events and what they are signaling loud and clear.
    LIZ ROSE
    Santa Cruz, Calif.

    Because Moore is too old to spank, he deserves a good slap in the face. He's like a spoiled child who runs around saying outrageous things to the delight of his dim-witted parents. Moore isn't cute; he's dangerous. To imply that 9/11 could have been prevented is ludicrous. Moore's anti-American rhetorical bomb throwing should not go unanswered.
    JOSEPH CALVINI SR.
    Mamaroneck, N.Y.

    Critics are willing to apply a stricter standard to Moore's presentation of his opinions than they do to Bush's argument for his. That's why Moore's movie is necessary. Those who desired a serious debate in the lead-up to the Iraq war waited in frustration for serious journalists to ask hard questions and apply critical scrutiny to the Administration's case. Moore's questions are the ones that should have been debated before we went into Iraq. Why should Moore's movie receive closer scrutiny than the Administration's decision to go to war?
    S. ANN ROBINSON
    Ashburn, Va.

    Fahrenheit 9/11 is not a documentary film; it is history's longest and most maliciously negative campaign ad. The filmmaker raises the art of innuendo and guilt by association to heights unimagined even by Senator Joseph McCarthy.
    RICHARD A. STACY
    Denver

    Moore's movie is a mirror image of the very truth-twisting tactics that he decries, proving that you can fool some of the people some of the time by pushing all the right buttons. Moore so deftly exploits class envy, ignorance, emotionalism, gullibility and victimhood that Fahrenheit 9/11 might just as well have been called Marketing 101.
    ROSALIE GRAHAM SZILAGYI
    Louisville, Ky.

    Just what we need: an arrogant loudmouth who represents a loony, paranoid faction. But it's not Rush Limbaugh. Surprise! It's Michael Moore!
    HEIDI CRABTREE
    Kennesaw, Ga.

    What is all the silliness in response to the long-overdue anti-Republican propaganda in Fahrenheit 9/11? Fox News unabashedly spews anti-Democratic invective daily, so why the deep concern about one movie? Right-wingers dish it out with impunity, but they are certainly whining about Moore's response. The world beyond U.S. borders recognizes the transparent absurdity of this redneck posturing. At least half of all Americans undoubtedly cringe at the loss of respect and dignity the U.S. suffers on the global stage because of the embarrassingly blind arrogance of its political right. At home Moore may be a thorn in Bush's side, but around the world the filmmaker's brand of honesty redeems the credibility of the U.S.
    JIM MARTENS
    Vernon, B.C.

    Equal-Opportunity Oppression

    "Wal-Mart's Gender Gap" [JULY 5] Addressed the sex-discrimination lawsuit brought against the giant retailer by female employees. But the company mistreats all workers. As your story noted, there are more than 30 lawsuits that accuse Wal-Mart of cheating employees out of overtime pay. The company has fought to keep out labor unions, and pays hourly workers a very low wage. Your report overemphasized the retailer's discrimination against women, suggesting that paying women less than men is more serious than paying poverty-level wages for all hourly employees. That attitude could be considered a kind of gender discrimination — against male hourly workers — and it keeps society from creating true equality and justice in the workplace.
    ROSOLINO SCARLATA
    Milan

    2. Previous Page
    3. 1
    4. 2
    5. 3