Letters

As your report "What Makes Teens Tick" aptly illustrated [May 10], science is catching up to what parents and teachers already know: teenagers' brains are different from adults'. The ability to make adult judgments comes later, as different parts of the brain develop. That is why our legal system does not allow people under 18 to vote, serve on juries or enjoy many of the other privileges and responsibilities of adults. It is also why juries are more and more unwilling to impose death sentences on juvenile offenders and why 31 states prohibit the practice. As we learn more from science and as it converges with legislation and the law, a consensus on this issue is increasingly clear.
DENNIS W. ARCHER, PRESIDENT
American Bar Association Chicago

As one of America's teenagers, I must say I am sick of stories that dissect teens' thoughts and lives. We are not science experiments; we are humans. Why is it necessary to pick us apart and figure out why we act the way we do? Does it take brain experiments to discover that we teens are rebellious? My 5-year-old brother could have told you that. I don't appreciate how teenagers are categorized as a group. Each of us is unique, just like every adult.
NAME WITHHELD
Tulsa, Okla.

LATEST COVER STORY
Mind & Body Happiness
Jan. 17, 2004

SPECIAL REPORTS

Coolest Video Games 2004

Coolest Inventions

Wireless Society

Cool Tech 2004

PHOTOS AND GRAPHICS

At The Epicenter

Paths to Pleasure

Quotes of the Week

This Week's Gadget

Cartoons of the Week

More graphics >>
More photos >>

MORE STORIES
Advisor: Rove Warrior
The Bushes: Family Dynasty
Klein: Benneton Ad Presidency

More Stories >>

CNN.com: Latest News

Thank you for your insightful article. Those of us who are attempting to parent teenage offspring can firmly attest to the mystifying ways of the adolescent mind. The child you have loved and nurtured for years suddenly morphs into an exasperating stranger! Research showing that teens' brains are not fully developed, mature organs but continue to undergo structural changes up to age 25 is truly a relief for those of us who have agonized over a teenager's predilection for risk taking, impulsive behavior and overriding lack of good judgment. This research frees us to be patient rather than react with frustration and to understand that we must remain involved while teenagers grow into adulthood, offering them guidance, structure and firm rules.
KIM TURPIN DAVIS, PRESIDENT
The Parents Council Of Washington
Bethesda, Md.

You overemphasized the importance of neural activity and brain physiology and made no mention of the need for moral guidance. Teenagers may read between the lines of the physiological mumbo jumbo and giggle with glee as they decide there is nothing they can do to change their ways. Why not discuss how dysfunctional family situations affect teen behavior? There is more to raising a teenager than studying the brain.
CECIL ASFOUR
Dallas

The obtuse rhetoric about adolescent moodiness was insulting to a large portion of today's youth, myself included. Many American teenagers are well-informed, intelligent citizens, and it's inappropriate to describe us as immoderate and out of control. Characterizing teen behavior as "exasperating" simply reflects stale stereotypes that harm the reputation of an entire age group. It is inadequate to dismiss adolescent angst as the result of structural changes in the physiology of the brain.
JIM FIELDS
Mountain View, Calif.

My 13-year-old son was captivated by your article. Thank you for enlightening my child. Now when I nag him for the umpteenth time to take out the garbage, I can see him replying, "Gee, Mom, I just don't have the motivation. It must be my immature nucleus accumbens."
SANDY BARTELL
Bellevue, Wash.

Who Controls the Economy?

In "When Presidents Have No Power" [May 10], essayist Charles Krauthammer argued that regardless of one's opinion of the state of the U.S. economy, the President really has no control over it. But Alan Greenspan says (and many economists agree) that America's huge budget deficits will leave the economy wobbling. Those deficits are largely the result of Bush's policies tax cuts, wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and so forth. If these actions leave the economy in a weakened state, I have to conclude that the President does, in fact, have significant control over the economy.
RICHARD WILHELM
Port Angeles, Wash.

Krauthammer had the guts to say what every Republican knows that in a capitalist country the people, not the President, affect the economy. If Americans spend billions of dollars on foreign products, U.S. unemployment goes up. If they buy products made in America, our unemployment goes down. It's human nature to blame the President for our mistakes, but if we really cared about U.S. workers, we would support them by buying U.S.-made products.
CLEVE MARK MCVANE JR.
Pleasant Hill, Calif.

No End to the Fighting

A continuing stream of resentments is turning Iraqis against the U.S. [May 10]. That's what happens when one country invades another with no clarion call from a significant portion of its population, not even from those who are being persecuted. How lucky for the U.S. that in the 19th century there was no nation strong enough or presumptive enough to attack our country to rid it of the dreadful scourge of slavery. Without having been asked, the U.S. is inflicting its desires and aspirations upon others. This type of behavior might cause the U.S. to be likened to a telemarketer, and before you know it, we may find ourselves being called Uncle Spam.
LEONARD GREENBERG
Sterling, Va.